![]() ![]() There isn’t a “yellow” indicator on the class either, so you don’t actually see the amount of warnings you have. ![]() What’s the problem with those warnings? That warnings are devalued. Even getters and setters on POJOs get the unused warnings. Maybe some spring plugin would take care of that, but spring is not the only framework that uses reflection. It uses spring, so these methods and fields are controller methods and autowired fields. Due to some extra cleverness, I have “unused methods” and “never assigned fields” all around the project.Eclipse feels smoother (I know that’s not a proper argument, but I can’t be more precise) I read somewhere that they were excessively repainting the screen elements, so that might be the explanation. There is some minor delay that I can’t define well, but “I feel it”. I don’t have representative benchmarks of that, and I know that my 8 GB RAM home machine is way to small for development nowadays, but still. Speaking of memory, It seems to be taking more memory than Eclipse.Apart from the bad usability, it has some memory overhead. So each time you need to step out of your main project, you launch another screen. And no, multi-module maven projects (which IDEA handles well) are not sufficient. Be it an “experiments” one, a “tools” one, or whatever. But I’ve never been in a situation, where you don’t at least occasionally need a separate project. Maybe there are those small companies with greenfield projects where you only need one. You can have only one project per screen.I think this makes the experience much worse. This is not a reasonable default at all, and I think the performance issues are the only reason it’s still the default. Also, a change in maven/gradle dependencies may introduces compilation issues that you don’t get to see. Refactoring by adding a method parameter, by changing the type of a parameter, by removing a parameter (where the IDE can’t infer which parameter is removed based on the types), by changing return types. Well, there are dozens of cases when it does happen. The rationale seems to be that if you use refactoring, that shouldn’t happen. I recently complained about that on twitter and it turns out “it’s a feature”. I know I need an upgrade, but that’s not the point – not having “build on change” was a huge surprise to me the first time I tried IDEA. And turning the autobild on makes my machine crawl. Projects are not automatically built (by default), so you can end up with compilation errors that you don’t see until you open a non-compiling file or run a build.And you can’t compensate for those with sugarcoating. But at least some of the problems I see have to do with the more basic development workflow and experience. Of course, IDEA has so much more cool features like code improvement suggestions and actually working plugins for everything. Not just because of all the key combinations I’ve internalized (you can reuse those in IDEA), but because there are still things I find worse in IDEA. I’ve been using mostly Eclipse for the past 12 years, but in some cases I did use IDEA – when I was writing Scala, when I was writing Android, and most recently – when Eclipse failed to be ready for the Java 9 release, so after half a day of trying to get it working, I just switched to IDEA until Eclipse finally gets a working Java 9 version (with Maven and the rest of the stuff).īut I will get back to Eclipse again, soon. IDEA is like the iPhone of IDEs – its users tell you that “you will feel how much better it is once you get used to it”, “are you STILL using Eclipse?”, “IDEA is so much better, I thought everyone has switched”, etc. Last year they were almost equal in usage, and I have the feeling things are swaying even more towards IDEA. The DVD Image (ISO) Installer is used to create a DVD version used to install on virtual machines or systems with a DVD drive.Over the years I’ve observed an inevitable shift from Eclipse to IntelliJ IDEA. The entire hard drive will be overwritten, dual booting with another OS is not supported. This is the preferred means of running pfSense software. The USB memstick image is meant to be written to a USB flash drive before use and includes an installer that installs pfSense software to the hard drive on your system. If you purchased a Netgate product, refer to the product manual for your appliance to see which reinstall image you need. The Netgate ADI image only supports a serial installation from memstick and does not come with VGA option. The amd64 architecture (which works even on Intel 64-bit CPUs) can address more memory and may have other performance advantages, but requires a compatible CPU. If you have a 64-bit capable CPU, use the amd64 version. You can determine the files needed for your install by reading the rest of this page for guidance. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |